publishing company in 1996, he went on to help start or grow several successful online publications, including Audioholics (as Editor-in-Chief for 12 years), Audiogurus, and AV Gadgets. He also carries several THX certifications (Technician I and II, THX Video), and is ISF Level II Certified.Īfter founding the CD Media, Inc. Working for such clients as Universal Pictures, Hollywood Pictures, Paramount Home Entertainment, NASA, Universal Studios, Planet Hollywood, SEGA, NASCAR, and others, Clint DeBoer dealt extensively with client management as well as film & video editing, color correction, and digital video & MPEG compression. Years later, he moved into the expanding area of video editing, where he served as the company’s senior AVID video editor for three years. Working on a myriad of feature films, Clint honed his skills as a dialogue editor, foley editor, and sound designer. After graduating at the top of his class with an Associates Degree in Recording Engineering, he began working for the famed Soundelux studios in 1994, one of the largest post-production companies specializing in audio for feature films & television. The potential downside is that its future is in question with Stanley Black and Decker’s relaunch of Craftsman.Clint’s career has covered nearly the entire realm of audio and video production. For a brand that’s generally considered to exist in the prosumer sphere of the market, this tool exceeds our expectations and leaves several members of our testing team with the impression that this is a tool they’re willing to reach for. Even though it finishes in 9th place overall, it beat out some big names like DeWalt, Hitachi, Bosch, and Milwaukee. We’ll be honest here, the Porter-Cable oscillating tool impressed us in our shootout. ![]() ![]() None of the tools we looked at were necessarily quiet, but this one thumbs its nose a bit at the idea of keeping its voice down.īuy on Amazon Final Thoughts on the Porter-Cable PCE606K Oscillating Tool We measured decibel levels at the ear while the tool was in use, and this one cranked out 101 dB(A). The Porter-Cable oscillating tool probably will you to keep ear protection on hand, er, on ear. Running this tool for longer periods of time won’t cause any undue numbness or discomfort that you’ll get from some of the cheap models. Still, we tested some models that really disappointed on this front, but Porter-Cable holds its own here. Its vibration control was about what you should expect from any professional level multi-tool, but it didn’t go above and beyond in this category. VibrationĪgain, this is one of those areas where the Porter-Cable oscillating tool finished in the middle of the table. We didn’t see this with any of the other models, but this attachment could find a lot of use with plunge cutting applications. One thing that’s unique to the Porter-Cable PCE606K oscillating tool is the depth and cutting guide. It finished in the middle of the pack, but aside from the far ends of the ranges, the differences in cutting speeds amongst the tools we tested fell within ten seconds of each other. ![]() This multi-tool also features a lock-on switch, as opposed to a variable speed trigger, which is helpful for longer cuts.Īs far as speed goes, the Porter-Cable oscillating tool didn’t disappoint, but it also didn’t blaze through cuts like a few of the models did. You can adjust the speed using the variable speed dial on the back of the tool, and it has an available range of 10,000-22,000 OPM. The Porter-Cable oscillating tool features a 3-amp motor and a 2.8° oscillation angle. A bit more contouring might help even further, but to be fair, we didn’t test a lot of multi-tools that really emphasize a contoured handle, and this is one of the more comfortable designs in the shootout. Overall, the tool feels relatively comfortable to hold onto, with the size, weight, and rubber grips playing a big part. The handle also has some grippy overmolding at the front, middle, and back of the tool. Porter-Cable designed this oscillating tool with a barrel grip.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |